Shaping the Future of Plastics: Why INC-5.2 in Geneva is a Defining Moment for Global Business
(Source Credits: UNEP)
The journey toward a legally binding global treaty on plastic pollution is approaching a critical juncture. The upcoming second part of the fifth session of the Intergovernmental Negotiating Committee (INC-5.2), scheduled for August 5-14, 2025, in Geneva, holds the potential to reshape the regulatory landscape for businesses worldwide.
While much attention is often focused on the environmental and social aspects of the plastics crisis, it's time to address the pressing business implications. For companies across industries, from packaging to petrochemicals, from consumer goods to logistics, the decisions made in Geneva will significantly influence operations, sourcing strategies, and long-term sustainability goals.
Where We Stand: Recap of the Negotiation Deadlock
The last session in Busan revealed a deep divide among nations. On one side, over 100 countries including EU members and small island states advocated for bold, binding measures like plastic production caps and chemical bans. On the other, oil-producing nations and industry-heavy economies resisted, citing economic dependencies and feasibility concerns.
The failure to reach consensus left three critical issues unresolved:
Plastic Production Limits: Should there be a global cap on virgin plastic production to curb excess supply?
Regulation of Chemicals in Plastics: How should the treaty manage hazardous additives and microplastics?
Financial Mechanisms: What financial models will support developing nations in meeting treaty obligations?
Business Implications: Why INC-5.2 Demands Attention
Regardless of sector, businesses must anticipate the ripple effects of the treaty:
1. Production Caps: Preparing for Supply Chain Disruption
With production caps on virgin plastics a likely outcome, businesses heavily reliant on fossil-fuel-derived plastics may face sourcing constraints. Early investment in recycled content, and closed-loop supply chains will provide a competitive edge.
2. Chemical Transparency & Compliance Costs
Expect new compliance standards regarding additives, PFAS, and microplastics. Traceability and transparency across the value chain will become non-negotiable. Those who proactively audit and reformulate materials will minimize future regulatory risks.
3. Financing & EPR Systems
Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR), plastic taxes, and financial contributions to global cleanup efforts are likely. Companies should begin budgeting for higher sustainability costs and explore ways to integrate circular business models to offset them.
The Opportunity: Lead the Transition, Don’t Just Comply
While regulatory mandates can often feel restrictive, INC-5.2 is an inflection point that rewards foresight. Businesses that pivot now toward circular economy principles, sustainable, and transparent procurement will be positioned as leaders.
Instead of waiting for treaty provisions to dictate action, progressive companies can:
Secure stable, sustainable supply chains by partnering with verified recyclers and material innovators.
Invest in technology and infrastructure for traceability and efficient recycling.
Collaborate across sectors and geographies to shape fair and feasible policy outcomes.
Final Thoughts
The treaty being negotiated in Geneva is clearly about future-proofing business models in a world demanding accountability and sustainability.
INC-5.2 is not a meeting to watch passively. It’s the moment to strategize, innovate, and lead.
Take Action with Plastics For Change
At Plastics For Change, we work directly with businesses to build transparent, ethical, and sustainable plastic supply chains. Our expertise in integrating recycled, fair-trade plastic into products helps companies stay ahead of policy shifts and lead the circular economy transformation.
Partner with us today to future-proof your sourcing strategy and create lasting impact.
Learn More & Get in Touch